Technology and Community
College Access
In a society
increasingly shaped by technology, students who are constrained by time and
place, or are otherwise disadvantaged, are being left behind (Matthews, 1999). According to Moore (2002), “Access [to higher
education] was originally thought of as the ability to gain entrance to an
institution or program. The concept
gradually shifted from one of equity in admissions to equity in outcomes, or
the ability of a student or group of students to succeed once admitted” (Moore,
2002).
The Digital Divide
Personified
New users of technology usually exhibit four stages of
readiness to access and use educational technology. The first stage is recognizing that
technology could enhance the efficiency, productivity, or quality of their
personal and professional lives. The
second stage is becoming open to learning about information technology and
learning to apply hardware and software to the task at hand. In the third stage, users seek physical
access to an appropriate technological infrastructure. In stage four, users actively follow through
on the decision to use technology (Watson, 2004).
Personal Thoughts
I think that we will see significant growth in distance education
within the CC in the future. I observe
my grandchildren and how computer usage is being implemented in their learning
process. They should have an advantage
to enroll in DE courses without any hinders.
I think of my children when they were in K-12 and how computers were not
implemented in their education until junior high school. They have a foundation to understand the
basics, and an understanding on how to research required information. As for my generation, the area of technology
we were exposed to in high school was the electric typewritten. Some of us are more at a disadvantage than
others. If we have not learned beyond
what we learned in high school we will have access issues.
Figure 1 |
Matthews, D. (1999). The
Origins of Distance Education and Its Use in the United
States: Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 27(2), 54–67.
States: Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 27(2), 54–67.
Moore, P. L. (2002). Access and Success in Web Courses at an
Urban Multicultural
Community College: The Student’s Perspective. Unpublished research report,
Northern Arizona University, (ED 465 402)
Watson, L. (2004). New Directions for Community Colleges: Access and
Technology. no. 128 (pp. 31-37). doi: 10.1002/cc.172
Community College: The Student’s Perspective. Unpublished research report,
Northern Arizona University, (ED 465 402)
Watson, L. (2004). New Directions for Community Colleges: Access and
Technology. no. 128 (pp. 31-37). doi: 10.1002/cc.172
A cartoonist's take on educational inequality! #SEN. (n.d.).
Retrieved February 15, 2015,
from http://www.mobypicture.com/user/TSfocus/view
from http://www.mobypicture.com/user/TSfocus/view
No comments:
Post a Comment